Tweet
The Difference between Ancient & Modern Technologies
I had been thinking over these issues for a long time and have come up with this:
1.Ancient people did not have these artificial technologies that we have now. In the absence of these tools they were bound to use their brains in close proximity to the nature.
2.What presently we are doing is to disregard the nature almost completely and try to develope alternates with the cocept that what we develop with our science knowledge and instruments are more powerful than the nature - pitty, we are not even close to the nature. However in some cases these new technologies surpasses nature.
3.As we go away from the nature, we loose our contact with our spiritual being - that the lastest science and development with all the tools we have can not even identify properly.
4.What I concluded within these scenarios is that presently we are trying to make something very small and then try to expand it to cover the whole universe to develope a science basis. Like making something infinitismly small and then to integrate it for a larger, real life size working. We, in this process forget that when we go from small to large, we are bound to generate larger and larger errors and for that we are trying to further develop more and more powerful computers with even tiniest manufacturing and this vicious circle goes on endlessly.
5.On the contrary, ancient people relied on the universal things like starts, sun and moon that are at very large distance from our earth. Thus their working is from large to small - that tends to reduce the errors in their working as they come close to real life size problem solving and that is how they had developed such astonishing things that we are just dreaming to.
6.They were thinking OUT OF THE BOX while we are standing within THE BOX OF SCIENCE AND MEASUREMENTS and can not think anything out of it.
I hope you might see my point of view. It is however quite difficult to think out of the box when we had been severely trained of all the technologies in the current system. But someday, someone would be able to explore the present unknowns and I congratulate him/her in anticipation.
1.Ancient people did not have these artificial technologies that we have now. In the absence of these tools they were bound to use their brains in close proximity to the nature.
2.What presently we are doing is to disregard the nature almost completely and try to develope alternates with the cocept that what we develop with our science knowledge and instruments are more powerful than the nature - pitty, we are not even close to the nature. However in some cases these new technologies surpasses nature.
3.As we go away from the nature, we loose our contact with our spiritual being - that the lastest science and development with all the tools we have can not even identify properly.
4.What I concluded within these scenarios is that presently we are trying to make something very small and then try to expand it to cover the whole universe to develope a science basis. Like making something infinitismly small and then to integrate it for a larger, real life size working. We, in this process forget that when we go from small to large, we are bound to generate larger and larger errors and for that we are trying to further develop more and more powerful computers with even tiniest manufacturing and this vicious circle goes on endlessly.
5.On the contrary, ancient people relied on the universal things like starts, sun and moon that are at very large distance from our earth. Thus their working is from large to small - that tends to reduce the errors in their working as they come close to real life size problem solving and that is how they had developed such astonishing things that we are just dreaming to.
6.They were thinking OUT OF THE BOX while we are standing within THE BOX OF SCIENCE AND MEASUREMENTS and can not think anything out of it.
I hope you might see my point of view. It is however quite difficult to think out of the box when we had been severely trained of all the technologies in the current system. But someday, someone would be able to explore the present unknowns and I congratulate him/her in anticipation.
Comment